Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for six months, respectively.
However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On February 3, 2018, around 02:05, the Defendants got drinking at the “F” point in the “F,” located in the G, Ulsan-gun, G (46 taxes) who had been drinking at another seat in the above main point, were feasd with the victim, and feasd with the victim, Defendant B was knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, and Defendant A was feasd at one time the victim’s back to the back to the main line, which is a dangerous object.
As a result, the Defendants conspiredd with the victim about two weeks of medical treatment, resulting in the injury of the two skins, such as the two skins.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each police statement made to H and G;
1. A report on occurrence, each internal investigation report, and each investigation report;
1. A written diagnosis of injury;
1. Application of each statute on photographs;
1. The Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 258-2(1), 257(1), and 30 of the Criminal Act
1. Defendants to be mitigated of small amount: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (the following favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);
1. The Defendants subject to suspended sentence: (a) on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter, taking into account the favorable circumstances of the reasons for sentencing); and (b) on the basis of all the factors indicated in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the Defendants’ age, environment, sex, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime; and (c) the sentence shall be determined as stated in the order, and the execution of the respective sentence shall be suspended.
The crime of this case was committed in collusion with the defendants, which is a dangerous object, and the nature of the crime was serious, and the defendant A had been punished for the same kind of crime. In the case of the defendant B, the defendants had been punished twice for the same crime: all of the crimes of this case; the defendants recognized the crimes of this case; the defendants are divided into their errors and are against the victim; the defendants were punished against the defendants by agreement with the victim.