Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

However, each of the above penalties shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are punished by imprisonment.

On August 28, 2012, around 00:10 on August 28, 2012, the Defendants thought that the victim E (the age of 32) driven a car in front of the bus stops in Jungcheon-si, Seoul Metropolitan City, while driving a car in front of the Defendants’ house and turning off the car over several times. While the Defendant was in time, the Defendant A puts a inserted (the length of 95C) that is a dangerous object on the victim.

The victim flicked the bat of the victim's flick with his left hand and flicked the chest with his flick, and the defendant B flicked him with his flick, and the defendant B flicked his flick (68cm in length, about 15cm in thickness x 7cm in thickness) and flicked his flick, such as the victim's right side, and flicked the victim's flick.

As a result, the Defendants conspiredd with the victim about three weeks of medical treatment, and led to the scopical scopical scopical scopical scop

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Police officers and prosecutor's protocol of statement regarding E;

1. 112. A list of receipt and handling of reports;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of injury diagnosis certificates and photographs;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 257 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Code for discretionary mitigation (Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Code (Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Code (Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Code is disputed in relation to the background or form of an act in which the defendant specifically injured the victim, but it is against the fact that the defendants specifically injured the victim, and the defendants' residence is habitually affected by automobile noise. The defendants' residence is an area where automobile noise occurs frequently. The noise generated on the day of the crime of this case also caused the crime of this case was caused by contingent failure to participate in the remaining net time after the defendants thought that the noise generated on the day of the crime of this case was also caused by the crime of this case, and the defendant B is an initial criminal without any criminal punishment imposed at all prior to the