logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.05.31 2016고단5183
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant around November 2015, in the vicinity of the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, "Nado Do Do Do Do Do , and it was well completed for one year.

If the internal tax amount is paid one million won per month in order to operate the nine old accounts, it will be paid KRW 9.6 million, including interest KRW 6 million on June 21, 2016.

“.....”

However, in fact, among the members of the fraternity organized by the defendant, only two persons who actually pay the fraternity were the victims, and the rest of the fraternity members were the creditors of the defendant who paid the fraternity instead of the defendant, and even if the defendant received the fraternity from the injured party due to the absence of particular assets at the time, it is difficult to pay the fraternity on the day of the normal operation of the fraternity to the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was issued KRW 7 million on seven occasions each month from November 12, 2015 to May 20, 2016, respectively, to the above victims, on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant had made a false statement; and (b) the Defendant was issued KRW 1 million from November 12, 2015 to May 20, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness C and witness D;

1. Some of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion of some part of the police interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. The defendant's assertion that the defendant operated a normal system, but did not pay a guidance to the victim due to aggravation of financial situation, and that he did not defraud money by deceiving the victim.

2. 판단 그러나 위 증거에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉, 피고인은 2015. 10. 경 피고인의 주거지 보증금을 위 계원 이자 채권자인 E에게 양도하는 등 피해 자로부터 계 불입금을 받기 시작할 무렵부터 자금사정이 매우 나빴던 점, 2015. 12. 경 계원 F 등과 함께 이 사건 계를 파기할 것을 의논하였으나, 피해자에게는 이와 같은 사정을 전혀 고지하지 아니한 점, 이 사건 계의 계원들 중 피해자와 G을 제외한...

arrow