Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, the above sentence shall be executed.

Punishment of the crime

1. From January 2, 2014 to January 23:11, 2014, Defendants: (a) jointly engaged in a e-art shipping store operated by the victim D located in Busan metropolitan Daegu metropolitan traffic Daegu; (b) Defendant A did not transfer KRW 600,000 of the intermediate proceeds of the store opened by the victim D to the e-art marine transport store operated by the victim D; (c) Defendant A did not transfer it to the e-mail depository; and (d) Defendant B stolen it to the e-mail depository; and (c) Defendant B stolen it by depositing it into the e-sports dividend account through the cash deposit source in the store; and (d) committed a theft of cash equivalent to KRW 3,250,000 in total by six times in the same way as indicated in the annexed crime list between January 22, 2014 and January 36, 2014.

2. Defendant A

A. On November 15, 2014, the Defendant, at around 15:48, worked as an employee at the E-art writing store operated by the victim D located in Busan Jin-gu, Busan, and caused a theft by failing to transfer KRW 1,050,000 for intermediate proceeds received from the plaintiff, the business owner, to a simplified store safe, without inserting the gap of KRW 1,050,000.

B. On December 22:14, 201, the Defendant, while working as an employee at the above E-Maart written book, was stolen by failing to transfer KRW 1,200,000 from the Plaintiff’s employer to a store simplified safe, instead of transferring the amount of KRW 1,20,000 to the store simplified safe.

3. Defendant B

A. On January 29, 2014, at around 19:11, the Defendant, while serving as an employee in the E-Maart shipping store, was stolen by not transferring KRW 500,000 to a simple store safe, instead of inserting the gap in the interim proceeds from sales store, which the owner of the business was negligent in monitoring the victim.

B. On January 31, 2014, the Defendant, at around 23:28, worked as an employee at the above E-Maart shipping store, calculated the gap in which the surveillance of the victim, who is the owner of the business, was neglected.