(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.07.18 2016구단181

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.07.18 2016구단181

국가유공자 및 보훈보상대상자 비해당처분 취소

Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 17, 1979, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from military service on October 7, 1982 with the maturity of the hospital.

On January 12, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on January 12, 2012, “The Plaintiff had been hospitalized with a mental illness after being admitted, had been suffering from neutism, such as eliminary depression, and could not receive training due to symptoms due to the absence of proper training.” However, on May 15, 2012, the Patriots and Veterans Deliberation Committee deliberated and resolved on May 15, 2012 as non-conformity of the requirements for soldier or policeman serving on duty.

B. On August 12, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that “a person has suffered a mental illness due to his/her sacity, etc.” and “mental disease” was different from

C. The results of the review by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement to the Plaintiff do not confirm two external wounds related to the military service. “The first diagnosis name: (a) Maul, the unqualified character. The history of the disease in the 103 Camp Hospital: (b) 2-year early retirement from high school (in the absence of school; (c) 2-year early departure from high school (in the absence of school); (d) 17-year early four months prior to his entrance in the house; and (e) 17-year-long stay in the military; and (e) 2-year-long stay in the military; (c) 17-year-long stay in the military; (d) 2-year-long stay in the military; and (e) 19-year-long stay in the military; and (e) 2-year-long stay in the military; and (e) 3-year-long stay in the military; and (e) 3-year-long stay in the military service.

“The decision was made. D.

Based on this, the defendant is the person of distinguished service to the State on February 11, 2016.

유사 판례

-서울행정법원 2019.01.17 2018구단62044

-광주고등법원 2015.05.28 2014누6219

-인천지방법원 2018.11.27 2017구단51485

-수원지방법원 2015.03.20 2013구단493

-대전지방법원 2017.02.16 2015구단948