logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.10.25 2018노1707
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(성적목적공공장소침입)등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., 4 million won of fine and 40 hours of completion of sexual assault treatment programs) of the lower court is deemed to be too uneasible and unfair.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the reasoning of the Prosecutor’s argument in the instant case and the grounds for sentencing indicated in the record, the lower court appears to have been reasonably determined by fully taking into account all the circumstances, including the various grounds for sentencing asserted by the Prosecutor, and no special circumstance exists to the extent that the lower court’s punishment is modified

B. According to Article 2 of the Addenda to the Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilities ( December 11, 2018), Article 59-3 of the Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilities, effective as of June 12, 2019, applies to a person who has committed a sex offense before the said Act enters into force and has not been finally determined.

Since the crime of this case constitutes a sex offense to which the above provision applies, this court should determine whether the defendant is sentenced to or exempted from the employment restriction order for welfare facilities for the disabled.

In light of the Defendant’s age, criminal record, family environment, social relationship, details and motive of the offense, method of and consequence of the offense, the degree and expected side effects of the Defendant’s disadvantage due to the employment restriction order, the preventive effect of the sex crime that may be achieved therefrom, the effect of the victim protection, the possibility of recidivism, etc., it is determined that there are special circumstances where the employment restriction should not be imposed on the Defendant pursuant to the proviso to Article 59-3(1) of the Welfare of Disabled Persons Act.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.

arrow