The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts and improper sentencing);

A. In fact, as stated in each of the facts charged in the instant case, it is recognized that the victim's caused bucks by mistake was sucked, but the Defendant was locked, which means that the Defendant was locked, and the Defendant was able not to work together, or that the bucks were put up by hand on the bucks (the crime No. 1) due to the accident (the crime No. 2 of the judgment), and there was no intention to commit each indecent act.

B. The sentence of the lower court (the amount of KRW 5 million, the amount of KRW 40 million, and the completion of the sexual assault treatment program) against an unfair defendant in sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In light of the aforementioned legal principles, the lower court’s duly adopted and examined evidence reveals the following circumstances: (i) the Defendant and the victim appear to have known from around 2015, but only sent contact with the Internet Messen, and (ii) the Defendant first appeared to have been made on September 2, 2017, which was the day immediately before the instant crime was committed, and the Defendant continued to express the victim’s intention to commit an indecent act on several occasions immediately before the police room or G cafeteria, and the Defendant’s refusal to commit an indecent act on the part of the victim (see Supreme Court Decision 2013Do556, Sept. 26, 2013).

Although this talks, the Defendant, at G cafeterias, brought the victim's losses again in the victim's buckbucks, and 5.