beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
Basic Facts
The status of the plaintiffs, etc., the Gyeonggi Savings Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Game Savings Bank"), the Korea Savings Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Korea Savings Bank"), the Youngnam Savings Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Yannam Savings Bank"), the Solomon Savings Bank (hereinafter referred to as the "Yannam Savings Bank"), the Solomon Savings Bank, the Solomon Savings Bank (hereinafter referred to as the " Solomon Savings Bank"), the Busan Solomon Savings Bank (hereinafter referred to as the "Slolomon Savings Bank, etc.") was declared bankrupt by all the corporations established for the purpose of credit fraternity business, credit installment business, etc., and the plaintiffs, the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation, etc. was appointed as the bankruptcy administrator, such as the Gyeonggi Savings Bank.
On May 13, 2008, the non-party C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "C") such as the joint and several surety debt of the non-party C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the non-party C") set each amount at an annual interest rate of 9% as shown in the attached Table from the Gyeonggi Savings Bank, etc. (hereinafter "the loan agreement of this case"), and B jointly and severally guaranteed the debt to the
Around May 13, 2009, the instant loan agreement extended the lending period from 9% to 12% per annum under the consent of B, a joint and several surety, and the interest rate was changed from 9% per annum to 13% per annum, and thereafter, the Gyeonggi Savings Bank, etc. extended the lending period from August 13, 201 to August 9, 201 with the consent of each joint and several surety as shown in the attached Table.
C did not pay each principal and interest to the Gyeonggi Savings Bank, etc. by the loan deadline, and each loan principal remains as shown in the attached Table as of the date of the closing of the argument in this case.
B “The remittance amount (Account Number): 100,000,000 No. 100,000 on April 15, 2011, No. 100,000 on the account transfer date of the account transfer from the account in the Defendant’s account in the Defendant’s name (hereinafter referred to as “CF”) and the remittance amount (hereinafter referred to as “CF”)” means 100,000,000 on September 15, 201: