The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The gist of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person driving C body-man vehicles.

On May 9, 2013, at around 01:20, the Defendant was driving at the speed of the king Bathing beach in the direction of the king mountain from May 9, 2013.

A driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents by checking the safety of the course and accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of the victim D (the age of 27) due to the failure to neglect this, the traffic of the damaged vehicle was driven by the victim D (the age of 27) due to the fault in the right before the right-hand, and the traffic of the damaged vehicle was shocked after the driver's seat in the front of the damaged vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim D, such as salt ties and tensions, which requires treatment for about three weeks by occupational negligence as above, and the victim F (the victim 20 years old) who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle, by approximately three weeks of age. The Defendant damaged the damaged vehicle to the extent that its repair cost is 11,966,196 won.

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the records, it is recognized that the victims agreed with the defendant on November 7, 2013, which was after the prosecution of this case, and expressed their intent not to have the defendant punished. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6)