1. The Defendant indicated in the attached Form No. 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 39, 40, among the 5,180 square meters in Chungcheongnam-gun B, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheong-gun, the Plaintiff.

1. The facts under the findings of fact do not conflict between the parties, or the facts under Gap's evidence 1 to 7 (including the number of branch numbers), and the court's verification results, and the overall purport of the arguments in addition to the overall purport of the arguments as a result of a request for measurement and appraisal with respect to the voice branch offices of the Korea Intellectual Property Corporation, the Korea Intellectual Property Corporation may recognize them, and the images of Eul Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are insufficient to reverse the following recognition, and no other counter-proof exists.

On May 2010, the defendant performed civil engineering works for the construction of factories on the ground of the Sound Group C of Chungcheongbuk-gun owned by it.

The Plaintiff is the owner of the instant land adjacent to the said land.

B. During the process of performing civil engineering works, the Defendant: (a) formed a bank on the ground of 459 square meters in the part concerning (b) specification of the attached drawing among the instant land; and (b) formed a ditch on the part concerning a cause caused by a

(F) In the past, there was a natural flow of water in the past, but the ditches of the current width and length were formed in the process of civil works by the Defendant (the ditches of the same width and length were formed in the process of civil works).2.

A. According to the above facts, the defendant, as the landowner of this case, is obligated to perform as stated in paragraph (1) of this Article, as the plaintiff seeking the removal of interference.

B. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant has a duty to remove the slopes and deliver the part of the land by removing the slopes on the surface of 30 square meters on the 141 square meters on the surface of 141 square meters on the land among the instant land in the process of the civil engineering work, and that the Plaintiff has a duty to deliver the said part of the land.

In the process of civil engineering works, the fact that the defendant dealt with the land at the bottom of the Gu, is not disputed between the parties or can be recognized by the evidence of the Si.

However, it is difficult to confirm how the land at the fest part was sloped even before the defendant's civil engineering works, how the slope was changed before and after the process of the civil engineering works, and the current use of the land at the fest part before and after the civil engineering works, etc.