1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 1, 1997, the Plaintiff was in the Army so-called, and was promoted to the So-called So-called Major on November 1, 2008. From January 9, 2013, the Plaintiff served as the Safety Officers in the Army Team as the Army Staff Officers.

B. On September 16, 2014, the Plaintiff was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year by imprisonment with labor for the following criminal facts (hereinafter “instant criminal facts”).

In 2013, the Plaintiff, as a result of a different 3 km from the time of the officer’s physical strength test, was 14 km at 5 km. However, although C had received 14 km at the time of the officer’s physical strength test, C, at the personnel service and office around the end of June 2013, 2013, made C, as a result of the physical strength test on the military executive officers scheduled to be registered in the “national defense personnel information system,” and made C, “A,” stating that “A person who prepared and completed x-cell files,” and “A, at the end of June 2013, requests C to change the records of different 13 km from the Plaintiff’s 3 km, thereby having C registered as it with

When the plaintiff suffered disciplinary action due to the above crime, the plaintiff and the Jung-young, who belongs to the personnel support headquarters of the military headquarters headquarters, was recruited to prevent the plaintiff from being subject to disciplinary action against the president F of the headquarters of the North Korean region headquarters of the E-Examination Games, the name poor, and the plaintiff.

On July 26, 2014, F made phone calls to the personnel staff member G of the Military Command on July 26, 2014, and “the forgery of official document of personnel participation, embezzlement of public funds, sexual harassment, abusive language and tatasing, etc., and considerable corruption was reported about the embezzlement of H’s perjury during the personnel service division, sexual harassment, verbal abuse, abusive language, etc. The same is to be an issue. The data will be an issue. The Plaintiff’s horse will be subject to disciplinary action and transfer, but there is no good means to regard the Plaintiff as one’s original relationship. There is no good means to regard the Plaintiff’s demand. The military personnel staff member, who is the degree of his or her superior, was threatened seven times by July 28, 2014, etc.

C. The plaintiff appealed, and the High Court for Armed Forces.