1. On August 25, 2017, the Defendant’s disposition of suspension from office for three months against the Plaintiff and disposition of imposition of KRW 180,000,00 for indemnity is all imposed.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a company operating financial business, and the Plaintiff is a person who was subject to a disposition of suspension from office on July 3, 2017 (hereinafter “instant suspension from office”) and a disposition of imposition of KRW 180,00,000 for indemnity (hereinafter “instant imposition disposition”) on August 25, 2017 after receiving a personnel waiting order from the Defendant as of July 3, 2017, while working as the head of the Defendant’s branch office (hereinafter “instant suspension from office”); and hereinafter “each of the instant disciplinary measures”).

B. On June 2016, the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office (1) organized the financial statements as if annual sales amounted to KRW 17 billion, and received loans from the Defendant and other eight commercial banks on a scale of KRW 17 billion (hereinafter “C Fraud loan case”). The Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office (hereinafter “C Fraud loan case”).

From July 4, 2016 to December 13, 2016, the Financial Supervisory Service issued a notice to the Defendant to “the Defendant to detect illegal loans during the first half of the year of 2017 and to take measures against them.” Accordingly, in the process of examining whether the prosecutor’s office affiliated with the Defendant had caused a large-scale overdue loan at Defendant Hongdong Branch on March 30, 2017, it was received that the prosecutor’s office affiliated with the Defendant was found to have caused a large-scale overdue loan at Defendant Hongdong Branch on March 30, 2017. After that, during the process of inspecting D, the inspector’s office affiliated with the Defendant was suspected by the Plaintiff (F accounting corporations and Gtax accounting corporations, etc. in connection with CB loan, were subject to a suspicion of manipulating the financial statements from the Plaintiff, and E was subject to a public prosecutor’s punishment imposed by the former accounting corporation and Gtax accounting corporation as the Plaintiff on July 6, 2017.