1. The Plaintiff:

A. The defendant Jung-gu corporation is within the 130-dong-dong-ro 130, Jung-gu, Daegu-dong-dong 130.

In light of the above, the Plaintiff’s sales of each of the instant stores was fully collected, and the amount calculated by deducting card fees and the Plaintiff’s fee (27% or 28% of monthly sales) was paid to the Defendants by the 15th of the following month. The sales of each of the instant stores was recorded as the Plaintiff’s sales performance, and the Defendant received only a certain portion of the sales revenue. The scope of application of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act is based on the amount calculated as “(the monthly rent) or 27% of the monthly sales of each of the instant stores or 28% of the sales revenue,” and the amount calculated as “the deposit or 27% of the sales revenue of each of the instant stores or 28% of the sales revenue,” and the amount calculated as “the deposit or 27% of the sales revenue of each of the instant stores or 100% of the sales revenue of each of the instant stores or the amount of sales revenue of each of the instant stores under the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act.”

(6) (Article 6). The Defendants are obligated to submit to the Plaintiff a certificate of employment, earned income receipt, etc. of major human resources, such as the shop, manager, etc. at the request of the Plaintiff (Article 9). The Plaintiff may, on a regular or occasional basis, supervise the status of operation of the coffee store by the Defendants, and instruct the Defendants to take corrective measures. The Defendants must immediately comply with the request. The Plaintiff has invested human resources