1. The defendants are about KRW 500,00 and each of the above amounts to plaintiffs A, respectively, 16,107,866 won, plaintiffs B, C, D, and E.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship 1) Plaintiff A’s relationship with the parties is as follows: (a) the Ivalescent Hospital in Ansan-si from April 5, 2012, which was located in H (hereinafter “instant hospital”).

(2) The Plaintiff B, C, D, and E are children of the Plaintiff. A are children of the Plaintiff. The Defendant F is a person operating the instant hospital, and Defendant G is the Plaintiff’s nursing staff.

B. On January 8, 2014, at around 11:00, Plaintiff A was taking a bath with Defendant G’s help from the toilets of the instant hospital. However, Defendant G moved to the right side of the shampoo with a shampoo, with a shower with heavy water coming from the Plaintiff’s seated, and the right side of the shampoo with the Plaintiff’s seated.

On the wind, the plaintiff A suffered ‘Se-Seng 2 Do video’

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the establishment of the liability for damages, Defendant G was negligent in neglecting the duty of care to ensure that safety accidents occur due to the Plaintiff’s desireing the Plaintiff A, who is a nursing worker of the Plaintiff, with dementia and skinson’s disease, and with poor communication and mobility. Defendant F was negligent in neglecting the duty of management and supervision over Defendant G as an employee of the Defendant G. Defendant F was negligent in neglecting the duty of management and supervision over the Defendant G as an employee. The instant accident occurred due to the Defendants’ negligence, and the Plaintiff A suffered video as above. Thus, the Defendants, a joint tortfeasor, as joint tortfeasor, are liable for damages suffered by the Plaintiffs, who are the Plaintiff and their children due to the instant accident.

3. In light of the fact that the Defendant G appears to have been able to express its intent to the Plaintiff’s health condition and water temperature, the occurrence and occurrence of the instant accident.