logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.07.24 2014고정910
식품위생법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who runs a dan in the name of “D” on the Seo-gu 1st floor of Gwangju.

Any person who intends to run a dan business shall obtain permission from the competent authority.

Nevertheless, without permission to conduct a danran business on March 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) without permission to conduct a danran business on March 3, 2014; (b) cooking facilities, such as cooling and gas bags in a size of about 60 square meters; and

The above outlines for customers, such as E (the age of 58) who have 8 rooms, etc. installed at each studio, etc. and found there

While singing on a counter-sing basis, singing 20,000 won, such as beer and 180,000 won, such as beer and beer, were engaged in singing and selling singinging bar business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. Application of each photograph of the investigation report (not less than 9 pages to 11 pages of investigation records)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 94 (1) 3 of the Food Sanitation Act and Articles 37 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts and the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is recognized that the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order include the following: (a) the Defendant’s mistake was divided and reflected; and (b) the Defendant appears to have economic difficulty in supporting both parents who are receiving treatment due to diseases, such as urology and high blood pressure, and those who are currently being prepared to enter a university or college or who are currently being employed.

However, the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that he was punished by a fine due to the violation of the Music Industry Promotion Act, stating that “the Defendant sold or offered alcoholic beverages in a singing practice room usingG, offered entertainment services, and offered a loan for employment,” which is a crime of the same kind in around 2012, by taking into account all the circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.

arrow