(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.07.09 2013고정2832

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.07.09 2013고정2832

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around the bus stops located adjacent to the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocheon-dong Hyundai Department Store Sexpex, the Defendant: (b) brought the victim to the taxi operated by himself on the ground that the victim C (32 years of age) was under the influence of alcohol and was boomed into the taxi; (c) brought the victim on the taxi to the taxi for delivery; and (d) brought the victim to the taxi again on the taxi operated by himself to the taxi; and (d) brought the victim to the taxi to the point of departure from the taxi to get the taxi, and caused the victim to go beyond the road, and caused the victim to suffer injury, such as cage cage cages, etc. which require treatment for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C Witness’s testimony;

1. CCTV images;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the upper part of the body;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no intention of injury since the victim was allowed to get off the taxi and returned to the taxi again on the day of the instant case, and the victim was not considered to have knife the back of the taxi. However, according to the witness C's statement and CCTV verification result, the defendant proceeded about about 10 meters after getting the victim to board the taxi and let the victim get off the taxi again, and the defendant got off the taxi again after getting off the taxi again, and proceeded as it was after he gets off the hand rapidly on the left side (the part of the center line). At the same time, the victim was acknowledged to have been knife with the back of the taxi. In light of the above recognition facts, the defendant, at the time of departure, has the victim knife the vehicle at the time of departure.

참조조문

유사 판례

-대구고등법원 2018.02.08 2017노488

-대전지방법원 공주지원 2014.11.07 2014고단109

-서울고등법원 2018.04.11 2017노3071

-대구지방법원 2020.04.03 2019고합483

-청주지방법원충주지원 2020.09.03 2020고합36