A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts;

A. From July 27, 2011 to July 11, 2012, the Defendant arranged commercial sex acts by selling a total of KRW 140,400,00,00,00 by raising sales sales of the Franchising business places operated by the Defendant, including 6 massage rooms and 4 smuggling rooms, female employees waiting rooms, and a shower rooms, who employ female employees G, H, etc., and then receiving KRW 1.20,000,00 from sexual buyers who found the above places of sexual traffic, and allowing the said G, etc. to take advantage of the sexual organ of the buyer’s sexual organ, thereby engaging in commercial sex acts by raising sales of KRW 144,40,00,000,000.

B. From December 2, 2011 to May 27, 2012, the Defendant distributed a name tag in which the telephone number prepared in advance at the I-I-I-I-I-I-Japan, and reported this fact to the sexual purchaser who calls, thereby arranging sexual traffic by sending the sexual traffic female to the sexual purchaser, such as the J employed by the Defendant, and receiving KRW 130,000 won of the sexual traffic price, and having sexual intercourse.

2. The accused who violated the Medical Service Act shall be from April 2012 to the same year.

5. From the end of 27th, after establishing 6 massage rooms at the above Franchising business establishment as set forth in paragraph 1(a), by employing K without being accredited as a massage, and having many unspecified customers find this place receive 120,000 won of the price including the price for similar act against the multiple customers, and let them feel fright by exposing up the franchis by cutting off the flachis by hand or enjoying the flachising the flachis.

As a result, the Defendant established a massage treatment facility without obtaining the recognition of the qualification of the massage operator.

3. On April 2012, the Defendant in violation of the Juvenile Protection Act employed a juvenile L (the age of 17) as an employee of the above business establishment without verifying the age while operating F, which is a business establishment harmful to juveniles engaging in sexual intercourse, such as similar acts, as seen above.

4...