beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and by a fine of three million won.
Defendant
B does not pay the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The sole criminal conduct of Defendant A;
A. On February 2, 2009, the Defendant must enter the Eelel located in the petition district in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and the victim F to the victim F by entering high school in Seoul.
If only 20 million won is lent, it shall be repaid to the Bank and the interest shall be paid in two installments per month.
“.....”
However, the facts revealed that the Defendant did not properly operate the telecom leased and operated by the Defendant from October 2008, and only caused losses to the extent that the Defendant did not pay electricity charges for the telecom. Even if the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party due to his failure to pay monthly rent or in the state of failure at the time, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay such money at that time.
In this regard, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; and (b) was delivered KRW 20 million from the ordinary land of February 2009 to the victim as the borrowed money.
B. The Defendant, around July 2009, shall install a computer in the above Eel, “G” Moel, and “G” Moel with a loan of KRW 10,000,000,000, and shall pay interest of KRW 2 per month.
“.....”
However, the defendant did not have any other property at the time and did not have any intention or ability to repay money from the injured party, even if he borrowed money from the injured party due to the lack of living expenses.
In this regard, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and was delivered from the victim to the victim as the borrowed money amounting to KRW 10 million around that time.
2. The Defendants committed the joint crime committed with the intent to borrow money from the injured party by forging each letter of transfer of claim under the name of H, an apartment owner’s interest lessor, who was the owner of the apartment leased and resided by Defendant A, and by deceiving the injured party while doing so as to be as if Defendant B had been H.
A. From June 2010, the Defendants who forged the private document and carried out the investigation document at the above Ecom 606 heading room, Defendant A, and Defendant A, at the end of the upper end, KRW 4 million out of the deposit.