logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.12.15 2017고단4820
협박등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 100,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) taken a taxi in front of an apartment on the roads in front of the apartment, which is a taxi engineer, at 705-gil-ro 28, Gandong Police Station located in the Dong-dong Police Station located in the 688-ro of the same sports, and (b) did not pay KRW 4,080,00 without justifiable grounds, even though the Defendant used the said taxi before the Dong-dong Police Station movement box located in the Dong-dong Police Station located in the 688-ro of the same sports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a taxi charge receipt;

1. Article 3 (1) 39 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act concerning the crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. Around July 13, 2017, the summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) around 02:41 on July 13, 2017, the Defendant: (b) in the Dong-dong Police Station Dong-dong Police Station movement box as indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1, the Defendant, who did not pay the said victim B (51) and taxi fares, threatening the victim to “Is the same taxi driver who died at the same time during the day of death, Isk and died at the same time in the same Dong-dong Police Station, Isk, Isker, Isk and die, and will die.”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s will specifically manifested in accordance with Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act.

The records show that the victim has withdrawn his wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow