logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.02.07 2013가합200579
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The Defendants shall receive the amount corresponding to the purchase price stated in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff at the same time.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff was a housing reconstruction and improvement project association established pursuant to the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) for the purpose of removing existing buildings on the ground of 28,753 square meters in Daegu Northern-gu P (hereinafter “instant improvement zone”) and constructing new buildings on the relevant land to improve urban and residential environment, and contributing to improving the residential stability and the quality of residential life of its members, and completed the registration of incorporation on June 17, 2005 with the approval of establishment from the head of the North-gu Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant authorization disposition”) from the owner of the land or building in the instant improvement zone after demanding the consent to establish the association from the owner of the land or building in the instant improvement zone.

B. On August 16, 2006, the Plaintiff filed an application for change of the establishment of the association with the North Korean head of Daegu Metropolitan City on the ground of a change in the area designated as a rearrangement zone, and submitted a comprehensive list of consent with the following details. On August 28, 2006, the head of the Daegu Metropolitan City North Korea filed an application for change of the establishment of the association.

The number/area of persons eligible for authorization/area/area consent rate (%) 184 persons who own land or buildings, 161 persons who own land or buildings, 172 persons 173.48%, 161 persons who own land (divided owners) 161 persons who own land, 93.79% land area 28,745 square meters 26,776 square meters 93.15%

C. At an ordinary general meeting held on March 30, 2012, the Plaintiff decided each of the following cases: (a) the consent to the alteration of the plan for rearrangement following the designation of the rearrangement zone; (b) the consent to the alteration of the plan for the establishment of the association (a summary of the new building, the estimated cost for the removal and new construction of the new building, the estimated cost for new construction, the details of the share sharing; and matters concerning the reversion of sectional ownership of the new building); and (c) the consent to the alteration of the project implementation plan following the application for the alteration of the project implementation plan; and (d) the Plaintiff is below the consent to the alteration of the plan from March 2012 to January 2013, 200.

arrow