1. The Defendant’s Suwon District Court Order 2012Kao-1029 dated February 18, 201, and Suwon District Court Order 8 January 201, 201.

1. The following facts are recognized as either a dispute between the parties or in full view of the evidence set forth in Items A(1) to 14 and the purport of the entire pleadings.

① The Defendant received a final decision against the Plaintiff on the following four costs of lawsuit from the Suwon District Court.

C. On March 4, 2011, 201, KRW 4,010Kada1029, KRW 583 on March 4, 201, KRW 583, 201; KRW 1,564,762 on February 4, 2013; KRW 1,564, KRW 184 on March 13, 2013; KRW 3,114, KRW 764 on March 29, 201; KRW 108; KRW 3,185, KRW 114, KRW 764 on October 10, 201; KRW 2018; KRW 1043,47; KRW 1043,407; and KRW 138,81,201 on August 13, 2013; and KRW 2013,00 on August 13, 2017.

③ In the case of KRW 4,014,583 of the costs of lawsuit established in the instant judgment rendered by the Suwon District Court on February 18, 2011, the KRW 2,281,638 was repaid upon the execution of the Defendant’s order of seizure and collection on August 9, 2012, and the Plaintiff deposited the remainder 1,732,945 on April 1, 201, in full repayment or deposit.

2. According to the judgment and the above-mentioned facts, since the debts of the costs of lawsuit confirmed in each of the above decisions were extinguished by full repayment or deposit for repayment, compulsory execution based on each of the above decisions shall be dismissed.

The plaintiff's claim shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and 50% of the costs of lawsuit shall be determined by considering the filing and progress of the lawsuit in this case, and the remainder shall be borne by the defendant.