logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.07.12 2017고단30
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a driver of a car in CKadidia.

On December 1, 2016, 08:49 around 08:49, the Defendant made the left turn to the left from the 3rd intersections of the smallest area to the private distance.

In this case, as a driver, there was a duty of care to see the electric signal and to safely drive by observing the signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left in violation of the signal, and received the part of the victim D(W, 30 years old) driver’s seat in front of the driver’s seat in the E rocketing car from the victim D(W, 30 years old) driving in accordance with the new code from the care park to the front part of the car of Kadidi.

As a result, the Defendant: (a) caused the injury of a salt, tension, etc. to the victim who requires the treatment of about two weeks; (b) destroyed the said rocketing car in a way that is equivalent to KRW 4,668,892 for repair costs; and (c) escaped without taking necessary measures, such as rescue of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with D (No. 8 times a net time);

1. A survey report on the actual condition, a photo of a lock-in-accident image fluor and a photographic on the scene of an accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written diagnosis and estimate;

1. Article 5-3 subparag. 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act (the occupation of measures not taken after an accident);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. 작량 감경 형법 제 53 조, 제 55조 제 1 항 제 3호 피고인의 주장에 관한 판단 피고인은 피해 자가 사고원인과 관련하여서 만 따지고 자신이 다쳤는지 여부에 대하여는 전혀 언급이 없었으며 피고인이 보기에도 피해자가 멀쩡해 보여 피해자가 다치지 않은 것으로 생각하였고, 사고 직후 피해자의 차량이 인도 상에 최종 정차되어 교통상의 위험과 장애가...

arrow