Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported the article recruitment of goods (C and Kakao Stockholm: D) on the B carpet bulletin board, and (b) decided to professionally purchase the stolen or lost stolen mobile phone to the names influence and communications companies using the above contact points; (c) posted a letter on the Internet website sales advertisement of stolen or lost mobile phones; and (d) conspired the Defendant with the other party to contact with the method of reporting the advertisement; and (e) the Defendant conspired to directly purchase the mobile phone with the other party or deliver the mobile phone, which has been sent to the door-to-door bus freight, to the name influence.

Thus, the Defendant, in collusion with his name in order to purchase 4,00,000,000 won from the non-specific male in the middle and middle half of 20,000 won in Samsung Ggal Do, which is owned by the victim E, in the vicinity of the subway station located in the Dong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, the early April 2016. From then on April 18, 2016, the Defendant acquired five cell phoness by purchasing 1,130,000 won in total through direct trade and door-to-door sales, such as in the list of crimes in the attached Form.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Answers on results of digital evidence analysis;

1. A report on investigation (attaching seized articles);

1. Application of seizure records and statutes concerning the list of seizure;

1. Article 362(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, the applicable provisions of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant guilty of Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with respect to the order of provisional payment is believed to have been unaware of the fact that he/she is a stolen in this court;

However, the investigative agency acknowledged that it was acquired with knowledge that it was stolen when it was investigated.

피고인과 성명 불상자 사이의 대화내용에는 ‘ 짭새’ 라는 단어가 등장하고, 휴대폰...