Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 11, 2015, around 08:15, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim G (hereinafter referred to as “victim”) by speaking to “the same year, the year in which he was unable to return, and the same year,” while attending E, F, etc. of D elementary school 3 grade 6 of D elementary school in front of the old door of the D elementary school located in Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G and H;

1. Description of Kakao Stockholm messages;

1. Application of CCTV image Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant guilty of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order and the defendant did not take a bath against the victim

Although denying the facts charged, the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence of the judgment, namely, ① the victim took the same bath as the facts charged to the victim.

Although the victim made a statement in exaggeration of his/her damage circumstances, according to the fact that the statement is consistent from the investigative agency to this court, and the fact that the victim made a statement to the third party that he/she took a bath from the defendant from the date of the occurrence of the case, it is difficult to deem the victim to have made a criminal complaint after the occurrence of the case. ③ The defendant and the victim's vehicle act in front of the D elementary school, such as 10 seconds or more on the ground that the defendant did not turn on the way in the process of causing damage to the victim's vehicle, and then the vehicle and the victim were faced with the victim's vehicle during the course of causing damage to the victim's vehicle, and the defendant seems to have sufficiently had the motive for the victim to take a bath. ④ The defendant was involved in the accident.