1. The Defendant’s KRW 9,557,136 as well as the annual rate of KRW 5% from July 3, 2018 to September 25, 2020 to the Plaintiff.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) C is as follows: (a) DNS car around 15:50 on July 3, 2018 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

2) The Plaintiff’s Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was proceeding along the five-lanes of the said road, led the Plaintiff’s vehicle from the third line to the fifth line in order to make a right-hand shift from the 5-lanes to the 5-lanes of the sub-sections of the sub-sections of the sub-sections of the 5-lanes of the sub-sections of the sub-sections of the sub-sections of the sub-sections of the sub-sections of the sub-sections of the sub-sections of the sub-sections of the sub-sections of the sub-sections of the sub-sections of the sub-sections of the sub-sections of the sub-sections.

2) The Plaintiff sustained the injury of the instant traffic accident, which caused the instant traffic accident to the right side of the Plaintiff.

3) The Defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract against the Defendant vehicle. The Defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with the Defendant vehicle. The fact that there is no dispute about the ground for recognition, Gap’s 1, 5, and Eul’s 1 through 4 (including serial numbers, and

each entry or video, the whole purport of the pleading;

B. According to the above recognition of liability, the Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the instant accident as the insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle, barring any special circumstance, since the Plaintiff was injured by the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle.

C. The Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff’s negligence should be recognized at least 30%, by asserting that the instant accident occurred due to negligence committed at a rapid and rapid speed while recognizing the change in the course of the Defendant’s vehicle.

However, above A.

As seen in the Claim, the instant accident occurred due to the change of the vehicle from the Defendant’s vehicle to the five-lanes in order to move off the vehicle to the other hand, and it was difficult for the Plaintiff, who was driving the five-lane normally, to anticipate a sudden change of the vehicle, as well as to avoid this.