beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On January 8, 2007, the defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of 7 million won for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daejeon District Court on January 8, 2007, and the defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of 4 million won for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Jung-gu District Court on September 7, 2012 at least twice.
On January 11, 2014, at around 02:05, the Defendant driven a DomW car from the front of the Yongsandong Samsung F&S apartment in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu to the front of the pedestrian crossing in front of the 85-dong, Mapo-gu, Seoul, with approximately KRW 200 meters alcohol concentration 0.092% under the influence of alcohol.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Report on detection of a host driver and report on the circumstances of a host driver;
1. Previous records: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry reports on criminal records, etc. (A), investigation reports (former records and court records on two or more occasions, etc.);
1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines for the crime, and the selection of fines;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Although the criminal liability of the crime of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the crime of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are not somewhat minor, such as the fact that the defendant was found to have committed the crime of this case while driving under the influence of alcohol, and the defendant was standing on the road while driving under the influence of alcohol, the crime of this case is discovered, the defendant's mistake is recognized and against himself, the fact that the defendant does not cause a traffic accident due to the driving of this case, the fact that the company accompanying a suspended sentence would be deemed to have to retire from the company