beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. According to the purport of Gap's evidence No. 2 and the argument as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government resident and the plaintiff is the manager of the above loan. The defendant, around 16:00 on February 17, 2012, when he was in dispute with the plaintiff in front of the above loan No. 2, he was in front of the above loan No. 16:00 on February 17, 2012, while he was in dispute with the plaintiff, he did not have any desire and verbal abuse, such as "I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am," "I am, I am, I am, I am," and "I am, I am," and the defendant was charged with a summary order of a fine of KRW 300,000 from the Seoul Southern District Court on June 13, 2013 and confirmed the above summary order around that time.
According to the above facts, the defendant's patent insultd the plaintiff through abusive language and abusive language. Thus, the consolation money for the plaintiff's mental suffering is obvious in light of the rule of experience that the plaintiff suffered from the above unlawful act, and it is reasonable to determine 300,000 won in light of all the above circumstances, such as the circumstance and contents of the defendant's abusive and abusive language.
Therefore, from February 17, 2012, which was the date of the above illegal act, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of 5% per annum as stipulated in the Civil Act until August 13, 2015, which is the date of the first instance judgment, and 20% per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day to the date of full payment.
Meanwhile, the Defendant submitted the evidence No. 1 to the effect that he deposited the amount of the judgment of the first instance for the Plaintiff, but this is to prevent the expansion of damages for delay cited by the Defendant in the judgment of the first instance and to avoid compulsory execution based on the provisional execution attached to the judgment.