logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.09.18 2014가합3797
토지매매대금 등
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 10,149,730 for each of the Plaintiffs and 5% per annum from May 29, 2015 to September 18, 2015; and (b) for each of the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Determination on a claim for payment of the purchase price

A. Facts of recognition 1) The Plaintiffs, on July 10, 2010, shall be integrated construction in order to provide name cards (D; hereinafter “comprehensive construction in name cards”).

) The land listed in the separate sheet and the attached list (hereinafter “instant site”).

2) The construction of a new 4 dong on the ground (hereinafter referred to as “instant construction”)

(2) The Plaintiffs waived the instant construction on December 25, 2010 to the Defendant’s husband E, who borrowed the name of the additional construction company (hereinafter “Industrial Complex Construction”) from the Defendant’s husband on December 25, 2010, under the name of KRW 1.574 billion (i.e., KRW 2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000) during the instant construction due to the lack of construction cost. However, the Plaintiffs waived the said construction on the ground that there was a lack of construction cost.

3) If the Plaintiff renounced the instant construction work to E, instead of giving up a large number of damages, the Plaintiff proposed to purchase the instant site and the instant aggregate construction work 95% in progress. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs and the Defendant purchased the instant construction permit in the name of the Plaintiffs, on March 18, 201, in which approximately 95% of the instant building site and the instant aggregate construction work was in progress on the instant land and its ground, and 2 and 4 Gara were to be constructed on March 18, 201, under the following conditions (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

A) The seller entered into a contract. The plaintiffs' buyer's goods: the defendant's goods: F. 8 parcels outside F. 8 of the Jeonnam-gun (The certificate of evidence No. 1 is stated as one parcel, but it seems to be a clerical error.

The plaintiffs and the defendant agree to enter into a sales contract on the 2nd 321st dong of the building on which approximately 95% of the ground foundation construction was completed, as follows: 1. The sales price of the above goods is as follows: Appendix 1, 2 (Building Permit in the name of the plaintiff) and Appendix 2 (Plaintiff A).

arrow