1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. Of the costs of appeal, the part arising from the intervention shall be borne by the Defendant Intervenor.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, such as admitting the judgment, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except to supplement or add the judgment as follows 2. Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article

2. The supplementary and additional defendant asserts as follows.

The purpose of Article 53-2 of the Private School Act is not in form, but in substance, it is difficult to secure the predictability of the examination method because it is difficult for teachers to be reappointed once every year because it is not enough time to prepare for the examination of reappointment.

In addition, the plaintiff's notification of this case cannot be justified because the plaintiff did not prepare standards, procedures, etc. to change the period of reappointment.

In addition, the plaintiff, if necessary, may set the term of appointment for a period other than one year, but the same period of appointment for the intervenors was reduced to one year. In light of this, the plaintiff did not undergo objective procedures for review of reappointment through individual evaluation of the intervenors.

Furthermore, since the plaintiff omitted the notification of the expiration of the term of appointment and the application for deliberation on reappointment, the plaintiff did not provide participants with an opportunity to state their opinions without applying for deliberation on reappointment, the deliberation on the reappointment of teachers and the resolution of the board of directors is null and void.

In addition, the plaintiff notified the participants whether they are reappointed 15 days before the expiration of the term of appointment in violation of the term of appointment.

In addition, the Plaintiff, at least in the teachers’ personnel committee, was not obligated to deliberate on whether it is necessary to determine the re-election period of at least one year.

(a) .