The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment defendant shows an attitude that all of the crimes in this case are recognized and reflected, and the defendant has no particular criminal record in addition to two fines due to the crimes in this case.

However, the crime of this case is planned by the method of committing the crime and interview, and the nature of the crime is poor, because the crime of this case was committed by holding a convenience store by force by using a large-sized vehicle and carrying the cash payment machine, etc. on the vehicle through the ever.

From the process of solicitation and preparation for the instant crime, the Defendant was involved in the instant crime, and the degree of participation in the instant crime is minor, such as carrying cash payment in the convenience store B along with B on the vehicle.

It cannot be seen, and even though the amount of damage caused by the instant crime is not a large amount, the damage was not completely recovered.

In addition, the sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable, considering the following circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions indicated in the previous theory.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.