logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.11.07 2013고단3126
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

10,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 28, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months from the Special Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes by the Ulsan District Court on May 28, 2009, and on October 20, 2010, was not a narcotics handler.

At around 21:00 on March 2, 2013, the Defendant injected approximately 0.03g of psychotropic drugs in the D Hospital No. 816 located in Suwon-gu, Busan, for a single-use injection machine, and melted them with water, and administered them into the blood transfusion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the accused, E, and F by the prosecution and copies thereof;

1. Copy of each prosecutor's statement concerning E;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Requests for appraisal made by the president of the National Institute of Scientific Investigation;

1. Investigation report (information obtained, report, etc. on crimes);

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and investigation reports (current status of personal identification);

1. Articles 60 (1) 2, 4 (1) 1, and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. of Specific Crimes;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (100,000 won at a time of sale) is that the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and six months for the crime of larceny, and again commits the crime of this case during the period of the repeated crime, and thus, commits the crime of this case more favorable to the defendant, such as the sentencing factors that are disadvantageous to the defendant, and the sentencing factors favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for the

arrow