A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2016. 8. 13. 01:04경 서울 마포구 B앞 도로에서, 차량 운전자가 도로 한복판에 차를 세운 채 잠을 자고 있다는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 서울마포경찰서 소속 경찰관인 경장 C으로부터, 피고인이 차량의 시동을 켠 채 변속기를 주행 상태에 놓고 운전석에서 잠이 들어 있고, 발음이 부정확하고 보행이 비틀거리며 안면 전체가 붉게 달아오른 상태로, 음주감지기에 의해 음주가 감지되는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 자동차를 운전하였다고 인정할만한 상당한 이유가 있어 같은 날 01:22경부터 01:52경까지 약 30분간 4회에 걸쳐 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받았음에도, 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Notification of the results of the drinking driving control, the report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver, the details of enforcement, and the report on the 112 case;

1. Application of each investigation report and the Acts and subordinate statutes on screen pictures for the closure of video images;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime.

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the defendant has already been punished for driving under drinking and driving without obtaining a license, but he/she again refuses to measure drinking after drinking.

However, it shall be decided as ordered in consideration of all the sentencing conditions, such as the fact that the crime is divided in depth, the fact that there is no record of more severe punishment than the fine, and the age of the defendant.