logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.02.16 2014고정1295
고등교육법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From March 2008 to August 26, 2013, the Defendant served as the president of the D School, who is a university in Bangladesh, from March 2008.

A bachelor’s degree at a university or college shall be awarded to a person who has completed a course determined by school regulations, and according to Article 37 of the School Regulations and Article 29 of the School Regulations, a bachelor’s degree may not be granted since he/she is not entitled to apply for an examination for the end of the relevant subject, unless he/she attends at least 3/4 of the total class hours.

Nevertheless, in order to raise the rate of strengthening and strengthening the college entrance, the Defendant granted a bachelor’s degree on February 18, 2010 to five persons, including Defendant, etc., who failed to attend at least 3/4 of the total class hours, and failed to complete the process prescribed by the above school juristic person E, in a normal manner, from February 16, 2012, as indicated in the attached list of crimes, to five persons, including Defendant, etc., who did not attend at least 3/4 of the total class hours.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of G, H, I, J, and K;

1. Statement of each police statement to G, H and K;

1. Each written answer to L, M, G, N,O, K, H, J, and P;

1. The Defendant of each written confirmation of I and G alleged to the effect that he did not know whether the employee prepared and processed the documents, and did not meet the actual class requirements. However, according to each of the above evidence, D schools at the time were difficult due to the lower transfer admission rate of D schools located in rural areas, and the Defendant and its executives and employees entered the schools and their families. At the time D schools at that time, the Defendant did not properly attend the schools due to the high level of most of the students’ age or having other jobs. The professor did not know that he did not attend the schools. The Defendant, despite being aware of this, gave points irrespective of his attendance, was the president of D schools, Q was the director of the corporation, and R had relation to D schools.

arrow