logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2019.07.24 2019고단142
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,500,000,000 to a fine for larceny, etc. on May 2, 2018, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 to a fine for the same crime in the same court on May 9, 2018, and on June 27, 2018, the Defendant had the record of criminal punishment three times of larceny, such as receiving a summary order of KRW 2,00,00 as a fine for the same crime in the same court on June 27, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

On February 19, 2019, at around 05:09, the Defendant: (a) committed a game with the victim D in the “CPC room” located in the fifth floor of the Main City B building in the original city; (b) was stolen with approximately 1.2 million won in the market price using the crepans or crepans.

The defendant of "2019 Highest 406" criminal records is a person who was charged with non-detained for larceny and is currently pending in the trial of the first instance on February 25, 2019.

Criminal facts

On February 23, 2019, at around 08:22, the Defendant stolen the victim’s property, with cash 100,000 won, where the victim’s surveillance was neglected in the “GPC bank” in the original E building and the “GPC bank” in the fourth floor of the victim F.

The defendant of "2019 Highest 458" criminal records is a person who was prosecuted on February 25, 2019 by the original court of the Chuncheon District Court for larceny and was not detained for the same crime in the same court on May 9, 2019 and is currently pending in the trial of the first instance.

Criminal facts

On February 21, 2019, the Defendant stolen the victim’s property by taking out 100,000 won in the saving depository in which the victim I was receiving education to do part-time within the J convenience point operated by the Defendant, which was operated by the Plaintiff I in the Haju-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Each statement of D and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning investigation reports, three relevant photographs, two relevant photographs, and two criminal records;

1. Articles 329 and 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow