The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the court below (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant recognized all the crimes and misjudgments the mistake, and that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, the defendant again committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime, including two times of punishment and two times of suspended execution, even though the defendant had a lot of records of punishment for violent crimes, due to the fact that he committed the crime of this case again during the period of repeated crime, due to the minor reasons, he committed the crime of this case, and the fact that the victim's head is at risk of being transferred through the minor cause, and violence has a high degree of risk of recidivism, and even if considering equity between the crime of causing property damage as stated in the judgment of this case and the case where the judgment becomes final and conclusive, even if considering the balance between the crime of causing property damage as stated in the judgment of this case and the crime of causing property damage, the punishment of this case is sentenced as the above property damage and the punishment of one year and six months of imprisonment, which are sentenced by the court below at the same time, it cannot be deemed unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.