logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2015.06.10 2014고단1375
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Seized evidence 1 to 33 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and the under-named winner (the birth of a single-name C) had access to the ship by sending a page to unspecified persons of the Republic of Korea using Internet-type less Internet-type fuseing fuses in a place below China, and had a view to receiving money by pretending to transfer money to a designated account if a female wants to do so. The under-namedist, while living in China in China, has induced to do the best hosting of money with unspecified persons and conditions in the Republic of Korea. On October 26, 2014, the Defendant recruited to take charge of withdrawing money transferred from those who want to return money to the Republic of Korea and return it to the Chinese account, respectively.

1. On November 28, 2014, in accordance with the aforementioned conspiracys, the person who was unaware of the name was willing to induce the victim D to hold a cell phone fluor at a place not exceeding China, and to keep the victim D, who had access to the cell phone fluor at a place not exceeding China, and to keep the victim D, who was transferred KRW 650,00 to his designated account.

However, in fact, the victim and the person who did not receive the statement was residing in China, and only for the purpose of acquiring the money remitted from the victim under the presumption of the condition that he/she had no intention or ability to allow the victim to talk with women.

In the end, the person who is not eligible for the name was accused of the victim as such, and the victim transferred 650,000 won to the account of community credit cooperatives in the name of E (Account Number: F) connected to the physical card held by the defendant on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the person who was not the party to the name, by deceiving the victim to acquire the property of the victim.

2. Any person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall specifically specify in other Acts and subordinate statutes the means of access used to direct the transactions in electronic financial transactions or to secure the authenticity and accuracy of the users and the details of transactions.

arrow