1. As to KRW 51,815,067 and KRW 39,806,797 among the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 51,815,067 from October 22, 2015, and KRW 12,008,270.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the Federation of Medical Society established under the Medical Service Act, and the Defendant served as the 36th president from May 1, 2009 to April 30, 2012.

B. The Plaintiff’s articles of association on the Plaintiff’s budget stipulate, “The addition or revision of the previous budget shall be subject to the resolution of the A general meeting,” and the Financial Business Regulations stipulate, “The expenses other than the purpose set forth in the budget shall not be used, but the diversion of the budget may be possible during the middle of each fiscal year, but the diversion of the budget shall not be permitted within the accounts, and the budget diversion between the government and the government and the government or between the paragraphs shall not be permitted, but in extenuating circumstances, the diversion of the budget can be allowed by the resolution of the Standing Committee, but in this case the president shall report the reasons and the amount

C. The Defendant, on June 3, 2009, held the “Executive Division and Audit Board meeting” at the third floor EM of the building in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul. In violation of the above Articles of Incorporation and the Financial Business Regulations, the Defendant prepared a document as if the Plaintiff’s affiliated agency received subsidies from the Plaintiff, but as if the FF Chairperson’s article monthly salary and vehicle oil price were paid to the Plaintiff’s internal employees, etc. from June 2009 to December 3, 2009, without the general meeting resolution from June 2009 to December 2009, the Defendant paid KRW 12,005,200 under the pretext of article monthly salary, vehicle oil expenses and other expenses, and 3,675,900 under the pretext of vehicle oil expenses and other expenses. 2) The Defendant concluded a research service agreement with the Plaintiff’s affiliated agency with the Plaintiff, which was known to the Plaintiff, and prepared research service expenses to the Plaintiff’s affiliated agency by means of false research service expenses.