Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., 15 years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment of the defendant has been in a marital relationship with the victim for not less than 35 years, and has been pursuing a family-centered life while carrying out economic activities faithfully, and the defendant had been able to do so due to the defendant's notified nature, but it has been relatively limited to the victim who has been born to the couple for a long time.
The defendant demanded the victim to keep the mother of the defendant's mother with the insurance money suffered from the defendant's and the defendant's mother's her life together with the victim's her mother. As a result, a conflict occurred with the victim, which led to frequent verbal dispute with the victim. On the day of committing the crime, it seems that the defendant committed the crime provoking by provokinging the victim's wrodic and dynamic sentiment.
The defendant shows the attitude of the investigative agency to recognize the crime of this case and to reflect the wrongness, and there is no record of criminal punishment, in addition to the punishment of a total of four fines due to the crime of violating the Automobile Management Act and the Road Act.
Furthermore, the Defendant was able to commit suicide by being shocked to the fact that the Defendant was killed of a victim due to a livered malm, cutting the blood hall by being shocked, making the scambling in the benda, etc., and resulting in serious injury, such as preventing the Defendant from walking without a scambling.
Some of the family members of the defendant and neighbors want to have the wife of the defendant.
These points are the circumstances that can be considered for the defendant.
However, the murder crime is a serious crime that infringes on the irrecoverable value of human life, and is therefore unable to recover damage in any way.
The victim feel severe fears, pains, and confidences due to the crime of this case, which the defendant, who was his spouse, was killed.