beta
Text
1. The judgment of the first instance, including the plaintiff's claim expanded in the trial, shall be modified as follows:
The defendant.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. At around 16:30 on October 2, 201, the Defendant: (a) driven D Poter Cargo (hereinafter referred to as “Aditered Vehicle”) in the intersection near the South-North Korean station in the south Korean station (hereinafter referred to as the “instant intersection”); (b) temporarily suspended the vehicle from the rith of the rith of the rith to the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith; and (c) had the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the rith of the Republic.
(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). B.
The defendant did not subscribe to liability insurance with respect to the above Maritime Vehicle;
C. The Plaintiff is a guarantor entrusted by the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport with the business of guaranteeing motor vehicle accident compensation under Article 30(1) of the Act on the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”).
The Plaintiff entered into a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with C with B, and entered into the same special agreement as to the non-insurance injury security. According to the above special agreement, E is the insured of the above special agreement.
E. By January 20, 2015, the Plaintiff deducted to E an amount equivalent to 20% of the E’s fault ratio of the instant accident, and paid KRW 100,000,000 in total as compensation for the business guaranteeing motor vehicle accident compensation and the insurance money under the said non-life insurance agreement.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 6, Eul evidence 1 and 4 (each number is included; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination
A. According to the above facts of recognition, the insured is an accident of this case to the extent of the amount paid by the Plaintiff.