The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the gist of the grounds for appeal, the punishment imposed by the court below (two years of suspended sentence in one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in light of the fact that the defendant confessions and reflects the defendant, and the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant by mutual consent with the victims.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, each of the crimes of this case committed by the Defendant in collaboration with Co-Defendant B and D, resulting in injury to the victim E for about 30 days in need of medical treatment. In other words, when the victims were in collusion with Co-Defendant B and D, the victims were in need of medical treatment for about 20 days, injury to the victim F in need of medical treatment for about 30 days, injury to the victim E in need of medical treatment for about 20 days, and the victim E suffered injury requiring medical treatment for about 20 days, and the case is not less easily. The Defendant again committed each of the crimes of this case in violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a collective action, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office on May 28, 2013, the lower court sentenced the maximum mitigation of punishment up to the Defendant’s favorable circumstances, and the circumstances and circumstances of the Defendant’s execution of each of the crimes in this case, as well as the circumstances and the reasons behind the suspended execution, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.