logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.10.20 2016구합84955
제재처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 1, 2012, the Plaintiff retired on August 31, 2015 while serving as the former secretary of the B Union (hereinafter “B Union”) and was elected as the president of the B Union from February 25, 2016.

B. As a result of Section B’s inspection with respect to the same person, the Defendant: “The total amount of assets of the 500 million won association, which is the limit set by the Financial Services Commission within the largest of 20/100 of its equity capital and 1/100 of its total amount of assets as of the end of the immediately preceding business year, was KRW 51.377 billion as of the end of 2013 and KRW 64.74 billion as of the end of 2014, and each of which was less than 1% as of KRW 50 million, was the same as the B association in 2014 and 2015, respectively, at the time of each of the instant loans. In the case of Table E, the first loan was executed in 2013, but the lending limit exceeded the same person due to the loan in the name of the F in 2014, and thus, the criteria for the request for mutual discipline of the same person under Article 201-416 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Credit Unions Act.”

(unit: KRW 10,00) G ordinary loans (as of August 19, 205) 285 (as of August 19, 2015) G ordinary loans in excess of the limit on the balance of the loan extended on the date of the loan extended by a person who borrowed borrowed loan holders (limit on collection) C. 480 common loans 480 November 20, 2014.

arrow