logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.09.17 2015고단1347
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be postponed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 11, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on January 20, 2008, a fine of KRW 1,500,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act was imposed at the Sungnam branch of Suwon District Court.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BM7 car.

1. On July 23, 2015, the Defendant driven the said SM7 car under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.125% without obtaining a driver’s license from the front of the “Nana Haak-gu in the Haak-dong in Gwangju City,” which was around 1.5 km at the center of Gwangju City, to around 8-2, the upper 1.5 km at the center of Gwangju City.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidenting Measures) provided that the Defendant driven the said SM7 vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as the date and time set forth in Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 1, thereby driving the said SM7 vehicle in front of the D cafeteria in Gwangju City at the speed of about 50 to 60km from the luminous apartment side to the malking.

At the time, it was night and there was an intersection with a signal signal at that time, and thus, the defendant engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle and prevent the accident by safely driving it, such as checking in advance the vehicle in the atmosphere and accurately operating the brake system by reducing the speed of the motor vehicle and checking it well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and continued to drive the FTrack vehicle in the victim E (the 60-year-old) driving that was at the front of the intersection, and did not immediately discover the FTrack vehicle in the victim E (the 60-year-old) drive and did not operate the U.S. system, and received the parts following the Track vehicle in the front of the said SM7 car.

In conclusion, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as cinal salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, due to the above occupational negligence, at the same time.

arrow