The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court, the lower court’s determination that the facts charged in this case were guilty on the grounds and circumstances stated in its reasoning is justifiable, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on false facts or by misapprehending the rules of logic and experience.

In addition, examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the records, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on mitigation of self-denunciation in rejecting the Defendant’s assertion on mitigation of self-denunciation based on the circumstances in its reasoning.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.