logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.04.26 2017고단231
식품위생법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall import or sell foods that are likely to cause harm to human health, and no one shall sell or import foods or additives that fail to meet the standards and specifications, for the purpose of sale.

피고인은 2016. 8. 20. 경 부산 부산진구 C, 309동 501호 피고인의 주거지에서, 인체의 건강을 해칠 우려가 있고 식품에서 검출되어서는 아니 되는 비만치료 제인 ‘ 시부 트라 민( 뇌졸증과 심혈관계 이상 반응 등을 이유로 2010. 10. 14. 이후 국내에서 판매금지)’ 성분이 함유되어 있는 ‘45 퀸’ 다이어트 식품 1통을 D에게 90,000원에 판매한 것을 비롯하여 그때부터 2016. 10. 13. 경까지 별지 범죄 일람표 기재와 같이 총 80회에 걸쳐 ‘45 퀸’ 다이어트 식품 948통을 합계 52,184,603원에 판매하였다.

As a result, the Defendant sold foods that are likely to harm the health of the human body, and sold foods that contain “caturine” ingredients that are not detected in foods, which do not meet the standards and specifications.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A response to a request for appraisal (2016-s-951);

1. 내사보고 (45 퀸 및 에스더 제품 사진 첨부에 대한)

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing personal financial transactions;

1. Article 94 (1) 1, Article 4 subparagraph 4 (a) of the Food Sanitation Act (a point of sale of harmful foods), Article 95 subparagraph 1, and Article 7 (4) of the Food Sanitation Act (a point of sale of foods in violation of the relevant standards) concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing criteria are applied as they are, in fact, as they reflect the reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act; the fact that there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine; and the fact that the sentencing criteria fall under the recommended commercial concurrent crimes according to the sentencing criteria.

arrow