logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.03.27 2015고단23
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 order 23] The Defendant, as an article of heavy equipment, has been designated as a D zone at the considerable cost of the Cheongju-si, with the intention of deceiving money by approaching the scrap metal businessman and acquiring money by borrowing the right of removal construction, notwithstanding the lack of the ability to receive orders for removal construction.

1. On December 27, 2013, the Defendant, at the office located in the Sinju-si, Cheongju-si, saying, “The removal Corporation of Housing Site Development in the D Zone shall have the authority to invest about KRW 1 billion in the Housing Site Development Association for 7 years already, and the Housing Site Development Association has already been concluded with the Housing Site Development Association. In addition, the Defendant may receive the removal work from the head of LH Corporation, who is an executor, and is well aware of the members of the National Assembly's private village, and who are moving back to the village of the members of the National Assembly. If the expenses for the removal of the D Zone are limited to the expenses for the down payment, it would be possible to receive the removal work of KRW 100,000 from the D Zone Housing Development Association as the down payment.”

However, in fact, the defendant merely thought that he will receive money from the victim to use the defendant's living expenses and personal debt repayment, did not have invested the defendant in advance with the housing site development cooperative in the area D, and did not have any agreement with the above union. Moreover, the removal of the housing site development zone was carried out by the company when selecting the events at LH Corporation, so the defendant did not have any intent or ability to allow the victim to take the removal work.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 10 million in total from the post office account (Account Number: F) in the name of the Defendant under the name of the victim as the contract deposit for removal works, on December 27, 2013, KRW 20 million on December 30, 2013, KRW 20 million on December 31, 2013, KRW 31,200,000 on December 31, 2013, and KRW 100 million on January 3, 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to take the property by deceiving the victim.

2...

arrow