The defendant shall be innocent.

The facts charged of this case

1. Around June 15, 2010, the Defendant expressed to the victim C by telephone that “A victim C shall have one fluorial fluorial fluor in the Jeonpopopopos. It is necessary to lend KRW 1.1 million to the victim. If we find this, the Defendant would sell Jinpos and pay it to KRW 1.2 million.”

However, the fact did not have the intention or ability to repay even if it borrowed money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 1.1 million won from the victim to the passbook of the Defendant’s community credit cooperative.

2. Around June 24, 2010, the Defendant stated, by telephone, that “I am more than 1,100,000 won need to be loaned to the victim. I would like to find this. I will make 2,400,000 won a sum of the refund that I would like to sell and sell.”

However, the fact did not have the intention or ability to repay even if it borrowed money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 1.1 million won from the victim to the above passbook.

3. Around December 20, 2010, the Defendant stated by telephone that “The Defendant would pay money to the victim if minging four sets are set in the Southern main market.”

However, the facts did not have the intention or ability to pay the amount even if the victim receives the money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, by deceiving the victim, was issued to the victim 1,90,000 won by mincing 4 punishment.

4. Around March 3, 2011, the Defendant stated that “Around March 3, 2011, the victim’s house located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, “I would return KRW 1,600,000,000 to 1.5 million after a day if I borrowed it.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the defendant.