Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a dump truck.

On October 29, 2013, the Defendant driven a dump truck on the dump truck on the 14:32th day of October 29, 2013, and continued to drive the motorway 38th day from the 38th day of the Cump tunnel management office located in Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu.

It is a motorway where the center line of yellow-ray is installed and it is impossible to hold a U.S., so a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to protect the tea well and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, as long as the Defendant neglected this and tried to see the median line as an opposite lane, the Defendant was negligent in driving the victim C(28 years old) driving in one lane in the opposite direction, and received the front part of the said dump truck as the rear part of the said dump truck.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the Defendant’s injury, such as pressure duplicating two pressures, which require approximately eight weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (on-site conditions, etc.), each investigation report (Attachment of a medical certificate, and attachment of a victim C’s telephone statement or sound recording);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the negligence of the defendant who caused a traffic accident by breaking the central line of the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the provisional payment order is not less severe, and that the defendant's dump truck drivened by the defendant was covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance policy, the punishment shall be determined like the order.