All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In other words, the Defendants conspired to misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles, and did not commit an assault by making flabbling the fat G, which was dispatched upon the report of 112.

Do. Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant charges by misunderstanding the facts or misapprehending the legal doctrine.

B. The lower court’s punishment of unreasonable sentencing (a fine of three million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. (1) Of the criminal facts stated in the judgment of the court below, the part related to the Defendants’ acts in the criminal facts as stated in the judgment of the court below was “A, at around 01:10 on December 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported at the restaurant business operator’s 112 report that he did not pay the drinking value after drinking; (b) expressed a bath to the above G; and (c) issued a warning that the said G would be subject to punishment for the crime of refluoration of the said G’s fabbage; (d) Defendant A fabbling the fabbb, and fabing the fab and fabing the fabs of the said G; and (e) Defendant B fabing the fabbage and fabing the arms.”

The evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below and the trial court [in particular, the Ecafeteria TV files (26 pages of the trial records), on-siteCCTV (67 pages of the investigation records)] and the records are as follows.

㈎ 시흥경찰서 F파출소 소속 경위 J와 경장 G는 2013. 12. 1. 23:54:35경 식당 내에서 피고인 A이 식탁에 엎드려 있고, 피고인 B이 앉아 있는 상태에서 식당에 들어왔고, 이후 G가 피고인 A의 뒤에서 뒷목의 옷깃을 잡아당기는 등 J와 G가 피고인 A을 깨우려고 하고 피고인 B은 이를 말렸으며, 그 상황이 약 6분간 지속되었다.

㈏ 피고인 A이 2013. 12. 2. 00:00:20경 자리에서 일어났으나 피고인들이 이후로도 식당에서 나가지 않자, J는 같은 날 02:15경 피고인들을 밀면서 식당 밖으로 내보내려고 하였고, 경찰들,...