logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.06.15 2016고단7135
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 29, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim J at the I office located in the Si of Busan Metropolitan City around December 29, 2009, stating that “The additional expenses are incurred in searching for the structural drawing according to the CGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG at its design office.”

However, in fact, even if the defendant had a personal debt worth KRW 150 million due to bad credit standing at the time and received money from the injured party, he did not think that it would be used as personal repayment and living expenses, and there was no think that it would be used as additional expenses for the structural construction.

Nevertheless, on December 29, 2009, the Defendant, as mentioned above, received a total of 17 million won from six times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form, including the remittance of 1 million won to the Daegu bank account in the name of L on December 29, 2009 from the victim, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim.

On November 2, 201, the Defendant called, “Around 2017, the Defendant prepared a standard subcontract agreement for the peltory construction works of the peltory construction works in the victim M and the NA-si N in Ansan-si around November 2, 201, the Defendant called, “A bank interest is insufficient in relation to the O hotel construction works,” and “A bank interest is expected to enter into a subcontract for the peltory construction works in the above construction site as well as to employ the site director as the site director.”

However, the defendant had a personal debt worth KRW 150 million due to bad credit standing at the time, and the land price was not paid to the owner of the above hotel, and it was not possible to carry out the above construction work because the construction commencement date was not submitted for the viewing of door, so there was no intention or ability to subcontract to the victim or to employ the victim as a site warden, as well as plans to use the victim's personal debt repayment and living expenses with money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant.

arrow