Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2018 Highest 1148" is the mother of victimized children C (family, female, 0 years of age) who has a duty to protect, rear, treat, and educate the victims.

The Defendant did not report the birth of a victimized child at the F Hospital located in the Busan Busan District E, but left the G apartment at around December 20, 2017, and left the house of the Defendant’s mother H, located in the 108 Dong Dong 112, and left the house from that time to May 9, 2018, because it is obvious that this part of the written indictment was a clerical error due to an error. Thus, the Defendant’s above correction is ex officio.

In order to find out the victimized children or to contact with them, the contact was cut down without any act.

As a result, the defendant neglected the basic protection, rearing, medical care and education, including food, clothing and shelter.

On May 2017, the Defendant received 100,000 won in cash from a man in the name in the accident due to Internet hosting fluencing flucing, "K," from the J located in Busan, Busan, on the Internet in May 2017, and engaged in sexual intercourse with the above name and the name and the name and the single sex intercourse.

On May 15, 2017, the Defendant ordered food using the PC until 10:00 on May 15, 2017, at the “N” room operated by the victim M in Busan-gu L, Busan-do, that the PC would normally pay the cost of using the PC and the cost of food. The Defendant ordered food using the PC until 10:00 of the same month.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay it.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, provided services and food equivalent to KRW 135,00 from the injured party, and met at the four-day shop in diving, and escaped from the above PC as it is, and exempted the payment of the above amount.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property and property benefits by deceiving the victim, and this part of the indictment is a clerical error due to mistake, so it is clear that it is ex officio.